Quick Search Terms
Are Radiographs an accurate method of diagnosing periodontal disease?
-
HardekopfJ, et al. The “furcation arrow” – A reliable radiographic image? J Periodontol. 58:258 – 261, 1986.
-
DeasDE, Moritz A., Mealey B et al: Clinical reliability of the furcation arrow as a diagnositc marker. J Periodontol 2006;77;1436-1441
-
OrtmanL, McHenry K, Hausmann E: Relationship between alveolar bone measured by 1251 absorptiometry with abalsysis of standardized radiographs: 2. Bjorn technique: J Periodntol 1982;53:311-314
-
BuchananSA, et al: Radiographic detection of dental calculus. J Periodontol. 58:747-751, 1987.
What alveolar crest level represents bone loss on a bitewing radiograph??
-
HausmanE., Allen K., Clerehugh V. What alveolar crest level on a bite wing radiograph represents bone loss? J Periodontol 1991;62;570-572
Are digital radiographs equivalent to conventional radiographs in revealing bone loss?
-
KhochtA, Janal M, Harasty L, Chang K: Comparison of direct digital and conventioanl intraoral radiographs in detecting alveolar bone loss. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134;1468-1475
-
BruderG, Casale J, Goren, A, Friedman S; Alteration of computer dental radiography images J Endod 1999;25;275-276
Are panoramic radiographs ever of value in periodontics?
-
KasajA, Vasiliu Ch, Willershausen B. Assessment of alveolar bone loss and angular bony defects on panoramic radiographs. Eur J Med Res. 2008 Jan 23;13(1):26-30.
-
PerssonRE, Tzannetou S, Feloutzis AG, Brägger U, Persson GR, Lang NP. Comparison between panoramic and intra-oral radiographs for the assessment of alveolar bone levels in a periodontal maintenance population. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Sep;30(9):833-9.
When should cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) be used?
-
The American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. The use of cone beam computed tomography in dentistry: An advisory statement from the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc 2012;143;899-902
-
MischKA, Yi ES, Sarment DP: Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for periodontal defect measurements.. J Periodontol. 2006 Jul;77(7):1261-6.
-
VandenbergheB, Jacobs R, Yang J. Detection of periodontal bone loss using digital intraoral and cone beam computed tomography images: an in vitro assessment of bony and/or infrabony defects. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008 Jul;37(5):252-60.
What if the significance of the lamina dura?
-
TibbettsJ, Allen K, Hausmann E: Effect of x-ray angulation on radiographic periodontal ligament space width. J Periodontol 63: 114-117, 1992
-
GreensteinG, Polson A, et al: Associations between crestal lamina dura and periodontal status. J. Periodontol. 52:362-366, 1981.
Can radiographs be used to detect progression of periodontitis?
-
SelikowitzH-S, et al: Retrospective longitudinal study of the rate of alveolar bone loss in humans using bite-wing radiographs. J. Clin. Periodontol. 8:431-438,1981.
Are radiographs an accurate way to assess healing after periodontal surgery? Do newer radiographic techniques improve the usefulness of radiographs?
-
TobackGA, Brunsvold MA, et al. The accuracy of radiographic methods in assessing the outcome of periodontal regenerative therapy. J Periodont 70:1479-1489,1999.
-
ZybutzM, Rapoport D, Laurell L, Persson GR. Comparisons of clinical and radiographicmeasurements of inter-proximal vertical defects before and 1 year after surgical treatments. J Clin Periodontol 27:179-186, 2000.
-
GrimardBA, Hoidal MJ, Mills MP, Mellonig JT, Nummikoski PV, Mealey BL. Comparison of clinical, periapical radiograph, and cone-beam volume tomography measurement techniques for assessing bone level changes following regenerative periodontal therapy. J Periodontol. 2009 Jan;80(1):48-55.
-
GorenAD, Dunn SM, Wolff M, van der Stelt PF, Colosi DC, Golub LM. Pilot study: digital subtraction radiography as a tool to assess alveolar bone changes in periodontitis patients under treatment with subantimicrobial doses of doxycycline. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; Oct;106(4):e40-5. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
How do Radiographic Measurements Compare to Clinical Examination Measurements?
-
PapapanouPN, Wennstrom JL: Radiographic and clinical assessments of destructive periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol.16:609-612, 1989.
-
MachteiEE, Hausmann E, Grossi SG, Dunford R, Genco RJ. The relationship and clinical changes in the periodontium. J Perio Res 32:661-666, 1997.
-
EickholzP, Hausmann E. Accuracy of radiographic assessment of interproximal bone loss in intrabony defects using linear measurements. Euro J Oral Sci 108:70-73, 2000.
-
PilgramTK, Hildebolt CF, et al. Relationships between radiographic alveolar bone height and probing attachment level: data from healthy post-menopausal women. J Clin Perio 27:341-346, 2000.
Comparison of Techniques
-
ReedBE, Polson AM : Relationships between bitewing and periapical radiographs in assessing crestal alveolar bone levels. J. Periodontol. 55:22-27, 1984.
Reviews
-
BennDK. A review of the reliability of radiographic measurements in estimating alveolar bone changes. J. Clin. Periodontol. 17:14-21, 1990. (Review)
-
JeffcoatMK. Radiographic methods for the detection of progressive alveolar bone loss. J Periodontol 63: (Suppl 4) 367-372, 1992. (Review)
-
TugnaitA, Clerehugh V, Hirschmann PN. The usefulness of radiographs in diagnosis and management of periodontal diseases: a review. J Dent 28:219-226, 2000. (Review)
-
KimIH, Mupparapu M.Dental radiographic guidelines: a review.Quintessence Int. 2009 May;40(5):389-98. Review
Are Radiographs an accurate method of diagnosing periodontal disease?
Topic:Furcation Arrow
Authors:Hardekopf J, et al. ARTICLE
Title:The “furcation arrow” – A reliable radiographic image?
Source:J.Periodontol.58:258-261,1986.
Type: Clinical study
Rating: Good
Keywords:Furcation Arrow, Radiograph
Furcation Arrow:Small triangular shadow across the mesial or distal roots of maxillary molars. Indicates class II or class III involvement.
P: To determine whether there is a consistent relationship between furcation arrows on radiographs and proximal bony furcation involvement in maxillary molars.
M&M: 45 adult human skulls with proximal furcation involvement in maxillary 1st or 2nd molars were used. 66 Degree 1, 53 Degree 2, 43 Degree 3 proximal furcation involvements. An additional 120 proximal furcations without bony involvement served as controls. Furcation classifications were determined independently by two examiners. Each maxillary molar was radiographed radiographed. Film placement was standardized to minimize interproximal overlap and to position the film lingually/palatally on a plane that paralleled the buccal surfaces of the teeth radiographed. Evaluations for the presence of the furcation arrow were made independently by 6 dentists as the radiographs were projected onto a screen. Projected radiographs with identifiable “arrow” images were used.
R: Incidence of furcation arrow image over degree 2 and 3 involvements was significantly greater than that observed over the uninvolved controls. The incidence of the furcation arrow image over the 120 uninvolved proximal furcations was low (18% for mesial and 7% for distal furcations). There was NSD between degree 1 involvement and the controls in the incidence of the furcation arrow image. There was an equal number of furcation arrows observed over mesial and distal furcations. The existence of a buccal furcation involvement of any degree did not influence the appearance of the furcation arrow. The image was no more likely to be observed over Degree 3 involvement than over Degree 2 involvement.
D: As the extent of furcation involvement increased, so did furcation arrow image. Degree 3 involvement reflected the radiographic image > 50% of the time. The furcation arrow seldom appears over uninvolved furcations, its appearance indicates that there is proximal bony furcation involvement. Absence of arrow does not indicate the absence of a bony furcation involvement. Root morphology and horizontal angulation of the tube head may be factors in determining whether a given furcation defect will exhibit an arrow.
BL: The radiographic presence of the furcation arrow appears to be a reliable diagnostic tool for the clinician when evaluating bony furcation involvement.
Topic:Furcations
Authors: Deas DE, Moritz A., Mealey B NO ARTICLE
Title:Clinical reliability of the furcation arrow as a diagnositc marker.
Source: J Periodontol 2006;77;1436-1441
Type:Clinical study
Rating: Good
Keywords:Furcation involvement, periapical, bitewings
B:Traditionally, radiographic assessment in conjunction with clinical probing using a curved explorer or furcation probe has been the chief diagnostic methods used for detecting and characterizing furcation involvement.
P:To evaluate the furcation arrow in a clinical setting, with emphasis on testing the assertion that the radiographic presence of a furcation arrow reliably identifies a furcation invasion.
Questions answered: 1. What is the prevalence of furcation arrow images in the radiographs of maxillary molars with periodontitis? 2. What is the interexaminer agreement on what constitutes a furcation arrow? 3. How does the presence or absence of a furcation arrow correlate with the true clinical status of the furcation? 4. What is the sensitivity and specificity of the furcation arrow as a diagnostic indicator?
M&M:89 patients were referred between February 2004-June 2005 for treatment of moderate to advanced periodontitis that required surgical access to at least one maxillary posterior sextant. Before surgery, one of five calibrated examiners viewed PA and BW radiographs of the surgical site and recorded the presence or absence of a furcation arrow at each proximal furcation. Before administering anesthesia, the same examiner recorded a Hamp index value of each proximal furcation. After flap reflection and debridement, the examiner recorded a second Hamp index at each proximal furcation. After surgery, each of the four remaining examiners independently reviewed the radiographs for furcation arrows. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed to correlate the appearance of the furcation arrow image to the actual degree of furcation invasion as determined by the intrasurgical Hamp index.
R:
-
164 maxillary molars were examined, providing 328 interproximal furcations
-
111/328 (33.8%) furcations were determined at surgical debridement to have a furcation invasion of Hamp degree of 1 or greater.
-
When comparing the appearance of the radiographic image to the extent of furcation invasion, 20/64 (31.3%) Hamp 1 furcation invasions and23/47 (48.9%) Hamp 2 and 3 furcation invasions were predicted by furcation arrows observed by at least three of five examiners.
-
The multirater k statistic for interexaminer agreement on the presence or absence of the image was 0.489 (low)
-
The sensitivity of the furcation arrow image as a diagnostic marker was 38.7%, and the specificity was 92.2% Most actual furcation invasions were not associated with a furcation arrow: a high number of false negatives. The absence of a furcation arrow had a much higher likelihood of not having an accompanying furcation invasion present: a low number of false positives.
-
The positive predictive value of the image was 71.7%, and the negative predictive value was 74.6%.
-
Of the 324 furcations used to compare clinical indices, the agreement of pre-anesthesia and post-debridement Hamp indices was 0% for degree 3, 83.7% for degree 2, and 98.4% for degree 1 furcation lesions.
C:Clinical probing, post-anesthetic sounding and surgical access provide more diagnostic data about furcations than the radiographs to the clinicians. The image is difficult to interpret and highly subjective and can correctly predict furcation invasions only 70% of the time when present on the radiograph. In addition, when furcation invasions are truly present, the furcation arrow is seen in <40% of sites.
Topic:standardized radiographs
Authors: Ortman L, McHenry K, Hausmann E NO ARTICLE
Title:Relationship between alveolar bone measured by 1251 absorptiometry with analysis of standardized radiographs: 2. Bjorn technique
Source:J Periodntol 1982;53:311-314
Type:Skull study
Rating:Fair
Keywords:standardized radiographs, Bjorn technique
B:Bjorn developed a bone scoring technique using the projected 5x magnification of periapical radiographs on a scale which divides the tooth into 5% portions.
P:To compare the Bjorn and Henrikson (125I absorptiometry) techniques in their ability to detect small bone changes.
Omnell demonstrated that established principles of radiation absorptiometry permitted measurement of alveolar bone mineral mass. Henrikson applied these principles to development of an 125I absorptiometry technique capable of detecting alveolar bone mass changes on the order of 5%. The technique utilizes an essentially monoenergetic radiation beam, a collimating device and a scintillation counter for directly determining the amount of absorbed radiation.
M&M: 4 periodontal defects were created in dried human skulls between 1stand 2nd PM and 1st M of differing sizes, with incremental reduction of approximately 10%. The defects were made either by reducing the buccal wall or creating crater like defects and were measured using both of the techniques utilizing stents for standardization.
R:In initial bone loss, the Bjorn technique consistently underestimated the amount. 53% of the bone as measured by 125I absorptiometry needed to be reduced before the Bjorn technique could detect any loss. In advanced bone loss, the Bjorn technique was shown to overestimate the amount of loss in 2 of the sites and underestimate in the two other sites.
Conclusion:When bone loss is under 30%, the Bjorn technique tends to underestimate how much true loss has occurred and when over 60%, it is inconsistent.
Topic:Radiography
Authors: Buchanan SA, et al ARTICLE
Title:Radiographic detection of dental calculus.
Source:J Periodontol. 58:747-751, 1987
Type:Clinical
Rating: Good
Keywords:calculus, radiographs, sensitivity, specificity.
P:To quantify the sensitivity, specificity and observer error associated with radiographic detection of dental calculus on proximal surfaces of teeth in patients with severe periodontitis.
M&M:18 patients that required extraction of at least 3 teeth because of severe periodontitis participated in the study. Excessively rotated or malpositioned teeth were not included in the study. Radiographic presence of calculus was determined by two examiners. After tooth extractions teeth were prepared and examined microscopically for calculus.
R:275 proximal tooth surfaces and the corresponding radiographs were available for evaluation. Mean AL was 5.8mm.
Of the 153 surfaces with calculus noted visually, radiographically calculus was detected 43.8% (false negative 56.2%), (low sensitivity).
Of the 73 surfaces with calculus present radiographically, 91.8% were determined calculus present clinically.
Of the 160 surfaces assessed radiographically as calculus absent, 46.3% were verified by visual examination to have no calculus.
Radiographic evaluation of calculus was not an effective diagnostic method in most surfaces with thin or moderate deposits.
C:Conventional radiographs are a poor diagnostic method for detection of calculus. Radiographic analysis predicted calculus on less than half of the proximal surfaces where deposits were present visually.
Whatalveolar crest level represents bone loss on a bitewing radiograph??
Topic:Radiographic measurement of bone
Author: Hausman E., Allen K., Clerehugh V. ARTICLE
Title: What alveolar crest level on a bite wing radiograph represents bone loss?
Source: J Periodontol 1991;62;570-572
Type:RCT
Rating:Good
Keywords:bone level, radiographic interpretation
P: Compute the distance from the CEJ to the alveolar crest on radiographs at sites where there was no clinical loss of attachment.
M&M:
-
Bitewing radiographs were taken on 68 pts (13-14 years old). A second set of radiographs were taken 18 months later.
-
The radiographs were taken using a routine unstandardized clinical technique and were processed under standardized conditions using a Refrema processing machine.
-
At each radiographic examination probing attachment level measurements were made at the mesio-buccal surfaces of the first molar teeth. Only the sites with zero attachment loss (attachment at the level of the CEJ) at both baseline and at 18 months were included in this study. A total of 134 sites included in the study.
-
A computer program was developed to measure the CEJ-crest distance (mm) in a line parallel to the long axis of the tooth.
R: The mean radiographic CEJ- alveolar crest distance (mm) for the 134 sites with zero loss of clinical attachment was 1.11 ±0.37 mm. at the initial examination and 1.19 ±0.34 mm at the same sites examined 18 months later . The 95% confidence limits were 0.4 mm to 1.9 mm.
BL: No crestal bone loss is consistent with a range of CEJ- alveolar bone crest distance between 0.4 and 1.9 mm as evidenced on bitewing radiographs.
Are digital radiographs equivalent to conventional radiographs in revealing bone loss?
Topic:Radiographic Interpretation
Authors: Khocht A, Janal M, Harasty L, Chang K: ARTICLE
Title: Comparison of direct digital and conventioanl intraoral radiographs in detecting alveolar bone loss.
Source: J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134;1468-1475
Type:Clinical Study
Rating: Good
Keywords:conventional radiographs, digital radiographs
P: To compare direct digital (D) and conventional (C) radiographic estimates of alveolar bone under normal clinical use.
M&M:25 subjects with perio with age range b/w 18-65 years and had full set of PAs and BW for diagnostic purpose and tx planning. All subject had min of 15 teeth without any intraoral pathology or systemic dz. A long cone parallel technique was used to take PAs and a paper sleeve with biting tab was used for BW. Within 4 weeks, a second set PAs and BW was taken with digital system (Shick). The distance from the CEJ (surfaces with non-identifiable CEJs due to restorations or overlapping were excluded) to the interproximal alveolar crest (where the PDL space ends on the root surface) was measured. 3rd molars were excluded. One examiner measured with a plastic ruler on the C x-rays while another examiner measured the D x-rays. Overall % agreement of first and second readings in C x-rays was 99 and it was 92 for the D images. The examiners performed their measurements independently from each other. Each examiner measured the conventional or digital radiographs twice and took two sets of measurements for each subject. The examiners took the second set of measurements without having access to the initial set.
R: Examiner measured 857 PAs and 315 BW image sites match on both radiographic systems.
-
Measurements in the D images for BW averaged about 0.3mm greater bone loss than did C x-rays.
-
For BW, the difference between C x-rays and D was not found in all mouth sextants.
-
Rather,more bone loss was indicated by D x-rays only in the posterior mand region (BW); measures in the posterior maxillary region were similar between the two methods.
-
Measurements from C PA images showed more bone loss in all max sextants.
-
Categorical bone levels (normal<3 mm, early-to-moderate loss 4-6mm and advanced loss>7mm) were assigned to evaluate how each rx method revealed bone level and loss. Agreement between D and C x-rays in revealing bone levels as normal or having early-to-moderate loss was low (D x-rays revealed more early-to-moderate sites).
It seems that digital radiographs impart a constant addition of millimeters to measures taken in the posterior mandibular.
C: Under normal clinical use and without standardized film positioning, the average bone level measurements varied SS between C and D radiographs in certain regions of the mouth and that the disagreement between these two systems is influenced by the type of image PA or BW as well.
Cr: It is very difficult to take x-rays at the exact same angle with the sensor/film in the exact same place to compare measurements. Also, there may be error in calculating exactly where the CEJ is on the x-ray. The digital sensor is a different size, not flexible, and can be more difficult to position than conventional films. Having the USB cord attached to the digital sensor may interfere with subjects biting down on the BW tabs.
Topic:radiographic alterations
Authors: BruderG, Casale J, Goren, A, Friedman S NO ARTICLE
Title:Alteration of computer dental radiography images
Source:J Endod ;25;275-276 DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80159-9
Rating: good
Keywords:radiography, distortion, digital images, alterations
P:to determine if digital images could be exported, altered, and then restored without visible signs of alteration
M&M:Images were exported from the computer radiography program, files were altered, then files were restored to the Schick format and printed
D:Digital images are relatively easy to export and alter with the use of a photo editing program. The need to implement technologies to safeguard digital radiography must be addressed to prevent potential abuses.
Are panoramic radiographs ever of value in periodontics?
Topic:Radiographs
Author: Kasaj A., Vasiliu Ch, et al. ARTICLE
Title:Assessment of alveolar bone loss and angular bony defects on panoramic radiographs
Source:Eur J Med Res. 2008 Jan 23;13(1):26-30
Type:Prospective study
Rating: Good
Keywords:Panoramic radiographs, angular bony defects, periodontal disease, bone loss
P: To investigate the prevalence and severity of alveolar bone loss and angular bony defects in randomly selected panoramic radiographs.
M&M: 500 panoramic radiographs of adult patients were studied. The mean age of the subjects was 51 years (range 20-80). Panoramic radiographs were placed on an x-ray viewer and evaluated by the same examiner. A calibrated periodontal probe was used to assess horizontal and vertical defects. If the interproximal projection of the CEJ was not identifiable, the apical termination of the restoration or crown margin was used for the measurements. A site was considered as having an angular bony defect if the bottom of the oblique radiolucency was located at least 2mm apical to the most coronal level of the interproximal alveolar bone.
R:
-In majority of subjects (86.7%) had some form of bone loss (horizontal and vertical).
–Angular bony defects were found in 49.8 % of the patients.
-Angular defects were more present in the mandible than in the maxilla, most frequently in the mandibular posterior, and least frequently in the mandibular anterior.
-The mean depth of the angular bony defects was 6.0 mm with the greatest mean depth in the maxillary anterior area (6.8 mm).
-The mean M-D width of the intrabony defects was 2.44 mm, and was most pronounced in maxillary molars (3.1 mm).
-Female subjects exhibited a gradual increase of vertical defect with age whereas in male subjects vertical bone loss was most prevalent in the age group 40-60 years and decreased in the older age group (60% vs. 40%).
-Interradicular molar radiolucencies demonstrated 38.3 % of the subjects and were more frequent in the md (first molar) than mx.
C: This study demonstrated a high prevalence of angular bony defects found on panoramic radiographs suitable for regenerative periodontal treatment.
Topic:Radiography
Authors: Persson RE, Tzannetou S, Feloutzis AG, Brägger U, Persson GR, Lang NP NO ARTICLE
Title:Comparison between panoramic and intra-oral radiographs for the assessment of alveolar bone levels in a periodontal maintenance population
Source:J Clin Periodontol. 2003. 30(9):833-9
Type:Clinical study
Rating: Good
Keywords:orthopantomogram; radiographs; alveolar bone level; diagnosis; periodontitis; maintenance population; agreement
P:To assess the level of agreement between intraoral and panoramic radiograph for direct measurements of the distance between the CEJ and the alveolar bone level (BL) as well as the proportional relationship (CEJ-BL/root length) and to explore the symmetry between left and right sided measurements.
M&M: Intraoral (IO) and panoramic (OPG) images were obtained from 292 patients on maintenance therapy. Two examiners performed measurements on digitally processed images. The distance between the CEJ and marginal BL was measured at the mesial and distal aspects of each tooth. The distance between the CEJ and apex of the tooth was also measured. The proportional distance between CEJ and BL relative to the length of the root was calculated.
R:All measurements between the two examiners showed no statistically significant differences. The largest mean proportional difference between CEJ and BL was seen in the maxillary right posterior segment, suggesting advanced periodontal disease in these sites. The largest difference between IO and OPG reading was observed between measurements for the maxillary anterior sextant, while the smallest difference was seen in the mandibular anterior sextant.
C: The study suggests that BL measurements between IO and OPG radiographs are highly comparable. The mean differences observed for the distance CEJ-BL in proportion to root length were neither statistically nor clinically different. A significant degree of symmetry of alveolar bone loss between the left and right side of the dentition was also found.
When should cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) be used?
Topic:CBCT in dentistry
Authors: The American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. NO ARTICLE
Title:The use of cone beam computed tomography in dentistry: An advisory statement from the American Dental Association Council on
Scientific Affairs.
Source:J Am Dent Assoc 2012;143;899-902
Type:Discussion
Rating: Good
Keywords:CBCT, ALARA
ADA Council on scientific affairs 2012: The use of CBCT in dentistry
CBCT imaging provides three-dimensional volumetric data construction of dental and associated maxillofacial structures with isotropic resolution and high dimensional accuracy.
A CBCT scanner uses a collimated x-ray source that produces a cone- or pyramid-shaped beam of x- radiation, which makes a single full or partial circular revolution around the patient, producing a sequence of discrete planar projection images using a digital detector. These two-dimensional images are reconstructed into a three-dimensional volume that can be viewed in a variety of ways, including cross-sectional images and volume renderings of the oral anatomy.
Although CBCT units produce a higher radiation dose than one would receive from a single traditional dental radiograph, the radiation dose delivered typically is less than that produced during a medical multichannel computed tomographic scan. CBCT radiation doses also vary widely according to the device used, x-ray energy and filtration, tolerance for image noise and motion artifacts and the size of the imaging area that is used to acquire volumetric data.
Principles for the safe use of dental and maxillofacial CBCT
– Should be used only after review of pt’s health, and imaging history and thorough clinical examination
– Should be used only after professional justification that the potential clinical benefits will outweigh the risks associated with exposure to ionizing radiation
-The clinician should prescribe traditional dental radiographs and CBCT scans only when he or she expects that the diagnostic yield will benefit patient care, enhance patient safety, sig- nificantly improve clinical outcomes or all of these.
-Should be considered as an adjunct to standard oral imaging modalities
– ALARA(As-low-as-reasonably-achievable) principle
– Should take every precaution to reduce radiation dose and ensure the patient’s safety. The use of thyroid collars and lead aprons is recommended when they do not interfere with the examination.
– Regardless of the primary purpose for the selection of CBCT, the complete image data set must be interpreted by a qualified health care provider. The prescribing clinician should receive a thorough radiological report
– Dental practitioners who use CBCT devices must receive appropriate training and education in the safe use of CBCT imaging systems
– Facilities using CBCT systems should consult a health physicist to perform equipment performance and compliance evaluations initially at installation and then follow a schedule in compliance with local, state and federal requirements
– Staffs of facilities using CBCT should establish a quality control program. This program can be based on the manufacturer’s recommendations

Topic:Radiograph
Authors: Misch KA, Yi ES, Sarment DP:. ARTICLE
Title: Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for periodontal defect measurements.
Source: J Periodontol. 2006 Jul;77(7):1261-6.
Type: Clinical study
Rating: Good
Keywords:Periodontal defect, CBCT
P:To compare linear measurements of periodontal defects using CBCT to traditional methods.
M&M: 2 human dry cadaver skulls with existing horizontal bone loss up to 20% were examined. Infrabony buccal, lingual, and interproximal defects with varying width and height were created with a bur in mandibular molar and premolar regions. Grooves were also placed vertically into the roots from the CEJ to the depth of defect. Gutta percha cones were superglued into the grooves. CBCT (i-cat) and PA radiographs were taken.

Measurements were taken from A) CEJ-depth of pocket, B) CEJ to alveolar crest, C) width of the defect. Impressions of the defects were taken, and all measurements were compared to electronic caliper measurements. The accuracy of impression and caliper measurements were verified using another set of defects with known height and width prepared in cast acrylic blocks. Statistical analysis was done.
R:
All infrabony defects were detected using CBCT and the probe.
Average correlation was 0.4 for direct, 0.53 for PA, 0.62 for CBCT and 0.95 for impressions.
Correlation varied b/w 0.09 and 0.99 within examiners.
NSSD between all the methods for CEJ-depth of pocket, detection of isolated IP defects, and for buccal and lingual defects.
C: CBCT measurements compared well to traditional methods, with the advantage of allowing observation of defects in all directions. Further investigation is needed.
Topic:CBCT vs intraoral radiographs
Authors:Vandenberghe B, Jacobs R, Yang J. ARTICLE
Title:Detection of periodontal bone loss using digital intraoral and cone beam computed tomography images: an in vitro assessment of bony and/or infrabony defects.
Source:Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008 Jul;37(5):252-60.
Type:Skull study
Rating:Good
Keywords:periodontium, crater, furcation involvement, intraoral radiography, cone beam computed tomography
P: To determine the diagnostic values of digital intraoral radiographs and cone beam CT (CBCT) in the determining bone loss, infrabony defects, and furcation involvement.
M&M: A cadaver head with upper and lower jaws fixed with 10% formalin and a dry skull covered with a soft tissue substitute were used to measure 71 selected periodontal defects. To assess bone levels, the CEJ was used as a reference point for the fixed jaws, and gutta-percha fixated onto the buccal and lingual of teeth for the dry skulls. Intraoral radiographs were obtained with standardized bite blocks. CBCT was obtained with I-CAT. For the CBCT the observation were made on a 5.2 mm panoramic reconstruction view and on .4mm thick cross-sectional slices. First part of the study: 43 randomly selected sites with linear or vertical defects were chosen for radiographic and CBCT assessment of the bone loss and compared to the actual measurements. Second part of the study, 11 teeth containing vertical defects or furcation involvement was compared to actual measurements. The defects were categorized by 1, 2, 3 and 4 walls and the furcations by class 1, 2,3. Readings were performed by 3 examiners a medical imaging master and PhD student, and two radiology faculty members.
R: No intra- or interobserver effect was found. No significant differences were found when comparing the radiographs with those on the panoramic reconstruction image of the CBCT. The mean error for bone level measurements was 0.56 mm for radiographs, 0.47 mm for the CBCT panoramic view and 0.29 mm for the .4mm thick cross-sectional slices.SSD between the cross sectional slices and the radiographs. The detection of crater and furcation failed 29% and 44% with radiographs, and 0% with CBCT.
C: CBCT allowed more accurate assessment of periodontal bone loss.
What if the significance of the lamina dura?
Topic:Lamina Dura
Authors: Tibbetts J, Allen K, Hausmann E ARTICLE
Title:Effect of x-ray angulation on radiographic periodontal ligament space width
Source:J Periodontol 63: 114-117, 1992
Type:Clinical
Rating: Good
Keywords:Periodontal ligament/anatomy and histology; periodontal ligament/radiography.
P:To determine the influence of known changes in x-ray beam angulation anticipated under clinical conditions on the change in radiographic ligament space width. Radiographs of molars and incisors were studied to determine the influence of anatomical factors on changes associated with alteration in x-ray beam angulation
M&M:Pairs of radiographs were taken of incisor and molar locations in whole dried human skulls with known differences in x-ray beam angulation. To be acceptable, radiographs had to meet the following requirements: 1) no overlaps of contact areas of adjacent teeth, 2) visible interdental alveolar bone, 3) no cone-cut in the radiograph, 4) sufficient contrast to read any anatomic structures present. Baseline for vertical angulation was set perpendicular of the long axis of the tooth. For each tooth site, radiographs were taken at 2 vertical angulations: 1) perpendicular to tooth’s buccal surface 0° and 2) 10° off the perpendicular. 5 different horizontal angulations at each of the 2 indicated vertical angulations 1) baseline 0°, 2) -3° and -6° from the perpendicular, 3) +3° and +6° from the perpendicular. Replicate radiographs were taken at 0° and at each of the 2 vertical angulations. The radiographs were converted to digitized images and PDL width measurements were made utilizing a computer program. Data were analyzed separately for the incisor and molar sites.
R:The variation between the mean difference of baseline measurements was compared with that of discrepant-angle combinations, 10/20 pairs of radiographs which differed in horizontal angle only were significantly different from results of baseline replicates. 2/5 groups of pairs of radiographs which differed in vertical angle only were significantly different from results of baseline replicates. 11/20 groups of pairs of radiographs which differed in both vertical and horizontal angulation were significantly different from results of baseline replicates. Mean PDL width differences for incisor locations were SS from the mean baseline PDL width difference, posterior PDL width difference showed no statistical variation from the mean baseline width difference
C:Changes in x-ray angulation resulted in a SS change in radiographic PDL width at incisor locations, no such significant effect was found at molar locations. At molar area, thick bone overlying PDL will tend to reduce the difference in density seen on the radiograph of the ligament space and adjacent interproximal bone. It is suggested the radiographs should be taken with controlled projection geometry when clinical interpretation of change in PDL width is desired.
Topic:Lamina dura
Author:Greenstein G, Polson A, et al ARTICLE
Title:Associations between crestal lamina dura and periodontal status.
Source: J. Periodontol. 52:362-366, 1981.
Type:RCT
Rating:Good
Keywords:lamina dura, radiographic diagnosis, bitewing radiographs
P:To investigate the association between the radiographic presence of crestal lamina dura and the clinical periodontal status of the corresponding interdental area.
M&M:
-
90 pts (53F, 37M; 21-45 years old) had 4 interproximal locations evaluated.
-
Sites were scored for visual inflammation, BOP, presence of PD> 3mm, and loss of attachment.
-
Bitewings and full mouthseries radiographs taken.
-
The radiographs were examined and scored for the presence or absence on an intact crestal lamina dura.
R: NSSD correlations were obtained between PA radiographs, presence of lamina dura and inflammation, PD, or attachment loss. On bitewings, there was a SSD between presence of crestal lamina dura and inflammation (81.9%) versus absence of crestal lamina dura and inflammation (72.5%).No SSD with the other parameters and bitewings. However, there were significant discrepancies on whether the crestal lamina dura was present (agreed 24% of the time) and agreed 89% of the time when absent.
BL: Radiographically, the crestal lamina dura did not appear to be related to the presence or absence of clinical inflammation, BOP, presence of pockets, or loss of attachment.


















